Fire Ratings on Gun Safes:
Fire Ratings on Gun Safes:
What the Numbers Really Mean
By Tom Kubiniec — President & CEO, SecureIt Tactical
Leading authority in military weapon storage and armory design
For decades, gun-safe manufacturers have promoted fire ratings as a primary measure of quality. Consumers are encouraged to compare safes by their claimed endurance: 30 minutes, 60 minutes, or even 90 minutes of protection.
The reality is far more complex. These ratings often fail to reflect conditions in an actual fire, and the science of heat transfer explains why a 1-hour rated gun safe can fail in as little as 3 minutes in a real fire.
Watch the Video!
The Science of Heat Transfer in Fire Exposure
The Science of Heat Transfer in Fire Exposure
Heat moves from hot gases to a cooler surface through three mechanisms: conduction, radiation, and convection. In fire scenarios, convection — the transfer of heat by moving air or gases — usually dominates.
The rate of convective heat transfer is governed by the equation: q = h × A × ΔT
where:
- q is the heat flux (energy per unit area per unit time),
- h is the convective heat transfer coefficient (W/m²·K),
- A is the surface area,
- ΔT is the temperature difference between the hot air and the safe’s surface.
Effect of Air Velocity on Convective Heat Transfer to a Gun Safe in Fire Conditions
Effect of Air Velocity on Convective Heat Transfer to a Gun Safe in Fire Conditions
(Shows the dramatic difference between still-air lab conditions and high-velocity forced convection.)
In forced convection — such as wind, drafts, or the turbulent airflow common in structure fires this boundary layer is stripped away. At air velocities around 60 mph (~27 m/s), h can rise to 150–250 W/m²·K or higher — often 10× or more the rate seen in still air.
Even brief exposure to high-velocity hot air (~1300°F / 704°C) can rapidly heat the outer steel shell. After the external heat source is removed, stored thermal energy in the metal continues to conduct inward — a process called heat soak — causing internal temperatures to keep rising.
How Fire Ratings Are Typically Created
How Fire Ratings Are Typically Created
Most gun-safe fire tests place the safe in a controlled furnace (still-air environment) and gradually raise the external temperature while monitoring the interior. Independent standards such as UL and ETL exist, typically exposing the safe to 1,700–1,850°F and requiring the interior to stay below 350°F for the rated time. Some protocols even include a cooling phase to evaluate heat soak.
However, these are static, low-airflow tests. Real structure fires involve rapidly fluctuating temperatures, oxygen shifts, collapsing materials, and strong convective flows — conditions that dramatically accelerate heat transfer far beyond what a still-air oven can replicate.
As a result, two safes with identical “60-minute” ratings can perform very differently when exposed to the dynamic airflow of an actual fire.
1-Hour Fire Rating vs. Real Fire Reality
1-Hour Fire Rating vs. Real Fire Reality
Convective air flow transfers heat 10 time faster than static (gun safe oven test). That means your 60 minute rating in a real fire is at best 5 minutes. When you consider heat soaking and steel, a 2-3 minute exposure can cook your safe.
Responsible firearm owners should treat fire ratings as a very limited data point—not a deciding factor. In today’s environment, the overall risk of residential fires has been steadily declining, which makes the industry’s continued emphasis on fire ratings worth questioning. In most real-world scenarios, these ratings provide little meaningful protection and often distract from the factors that actually determine whether firearms are protected or recoverable after a fire.
Transient Heat Transfer in a Gun Safe Under High-Velocity Hot Air Exposure
Transient Heat Transfer in a Gun Safe Under High-Velocity Hot Air Exposure
(Illustrates a 3-minute exposure followed by continued internal temperature rise, reaching ~350°F in approximately 10 minutes total.)
350°F (177°C) is a widely recognized threshold above which paper documents, electronics, and many firearm components or accessories can suffer damage.
The Hidden Problem with Drywall Fire Linings
The Hidden Problem with Drywall Fire Linings
To achieve respectable ratings in still-air tests, many gun safes line their interiors with drywall (gypsum board). The chemically bound water in gypsum releases as steam when heated, temporarily absorbing energy and slowing the temperature rise inside the safe.
This works reasonably well in a controlled, low-convection oven test. In a real fire with forced convection, the outer steel heats so rapidly that the drywall’s benefit is often overwhelmed.
Beyond performance limitations, drywall introduces a long-term risk for firearm storage. Gypsum can release moisture and sulfur compounds over time, especially in a sealed steel enclosure. These can create a corrosive micro-environment that attacks barrels, springs, optics mounts, and other metal components — even when no fire ever occurs.
Fire Ratings vs. Fire Reality
Fire protection depends on construction materials, insulation performance, exposure duration, airflow conditions, and building behavior. Reducing this complexity to a single “minutes of protection” number creates a false sense of precision.
The Bottom Line
Will your fire rated gun safe survive a fire? Probably not
Gun-safe fire ratings are not inherently fraudulent, but they are misunderstood and overstated in marketing. Most are derived from manufacturer or lab tests conducted in still air — conditions that differ significantly from the high-velocity, convective environment of a real fire.
The drywall often used to achieve those ratings can provide short-term benefits in testing while introducing corrosion risks to the very firearms the safe is meant to protect.
Smart storage decisions start with engineering reality, not simplified labels. When evaluating a gun safe, look beyond the fire rating number to the actual construction, materials, and how the safe handles the physics of heat transfer in dynamic conditions.
Technical References
Fire Testing Standards
- UL 72 — Standard for Tests for Fire Resistance of Record Protection Equipment
- ANSI / UL 72 — Fire Resistance Testing Standard Overview
- Intertek — Fire Resistance Testing Services
Fire Science & Residential Fire Behavior
- NFPA — Home Structure Fire Research
- NIST — Fire Dynamics Research
- FSRI — Modern Fire Behavior Research
Heat Transfer & Structural Fire Conditions
Related Articles
By Line
By Line
Tom Kubiniec Role: President CEO, SecureIt Tactical 2001,the Department of Defense called on CEO Tom Kubiniec to transform their cluttered weapon racks into organized, efficient weapon storage systems.Tom Kubiniec is the President and CEO of SecureIt Tactical and a recognized authority on firearm storage and armory design. He has spent decades designing, evaluating, and correcting weapon storage systems, including the modernization of armories used by U.S. military and law-enforcement units. Kubiniec is the inventor of CradleGrid®, a modular weapon-storage system developed to replace the fixed interiors and poor access common in traditional gun safes. His work centers on building storage systems that protect equipment, allow clean and repeatable access, and remain functional as firearms and gear change over time.
